Lets Make a Game Together

Why hello there. Let me start off by saying that the lot of you are a bunch of scrubs at mafia. Difficult though it may seem to take in, you need to realise that following and bandwagoning a specific person with baseless accusations is anti-town behaviour. I have no doubt that those who followed the Zyph bandwagon is a mixture of beginners and the odd scum. I am puzzled by Meloetta's claim of being a villager... it has no bearing on whether they are or not, as a mafia could have easily said the same thing with the same result. Furthermore, it seems like a rather poor ploy to make Meloetta look less scummy.. which in turn does the opposite. I am inclined to believe that Meloetta is a fairly inexperienced mafia player, or just a scum. Nowhere in my role PM does it state "you're a villager" using those exact words; Meloetta is implying that it does, due to the use of quotation marks. However, their play afterwards seems relatively town noob than scum...

Namine on the other hand is a little iffy, although I cannot pinpoint why (apologies for not giving your "e" an accent, i'm afraid I don't possess that symbol ;_; Meloetta claims villager, as does Zyph, but then Namine's claim just seems a little latched on more than anything else.

So, Meloetta starts the baseless bandwagon, and like sheep, you all swarm around it (okay perhaps sheep aren't known for swarming, but you get my point). Contrary to what you may believe however, I am fine with Meloetta voting Zyph. While it may be baseless, the game was, and perhaps still is at its RVS stage (Random Voting Stage). What bugs me is the bandwagon (randwagon?) afterwards.

Inzanagi is a curious fellow...not saying anything for the whole game, popping up to lynch Zyph, and then disappearing again. That would be a scum read of mine, but I can't really say as all you guys are new players.

Present makes a solid post soon afterwards, although that's not indicative as to whether they are scum or not. You can tell however that they are new to mafia, despite the good post, 1) Hasn't heard of the RVS and 2) Advises a No Lynch. Let me tell you guys, a No Lynch is terrible for several reasons. It gives the mafia a chance to kill off the night while knowing that they were untouchable D1, and it means that going into D2 we still won't have anything to base accusations off, save a possible inspection.

Sojano's post is decent, if a little bland. He states the obvious (*might* have an important role). which you could say for anything, but hey, he's trying to help. I'm no sure what Eneomas is trying to get across with his post. His vote is only non-existent if he doesn't vote... he has the freedom to vote/unvote whenever, so I'm not sure what's stopping him. The thing is, he doesn't give reasoning for thinking Present as suspicous.

Porygon Bomb had a very strange, inflammatory po-oh wait, that's me! PORYGON BOMB WAS SUPER TOWNIE

Oh, Present says that he's experienced at mafia, nevermind.

I'll post more after dinner.

Oi everybody stop being so inactive

Eagle4, you clearly don't have a solid reason to vote on me. I am fine since this is the RVS, but first get some reason to vote and I don't have a special ability indeed...

What the heck do you mean that I don't have a reason to lynch you

1) Trying very hard to make yourself look village by starting off the baseless village statements, which in turn makes you more scummy.
2) Stating that you have a reason for lynching the person, but you can't tell..? I don't want to repeat myself, look again at what I said

I'd rather you defend yourself than "eww no yew hav no reasuns"

...

If you defend yourself properly, then I'll look elsewhere for somebody to vote on

as far as i know, The vilager enemy ratio is in favour to the Villagers. therefore random voting will have a bigger chance of destroying an innocent life than rightly killing a overworlder. Voting now is dangerous as such, i won't though i suspect everyone, eceryone but Zap (don't ruin that)